Talk:Jason Derulo discography

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Discographies

This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merge back to artist article[edit]

Merge this guy has only released 1 single in most countries and his debut album isn't due out for another two months. it really does not deserve it's own article. Mister sparky (talk) 22:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I agree, I dont know what the deal is with people suddenly rushing to create discography pages for artists with minimal output. - eo (talk) 01:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No point in merging back when over time, it will get larger and so will his main page. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And when it does, restore this page. –Chase (talk) 03:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, obviously. He only has two singles out at the moment. There's no need to waste article space with something that—for now—can easily be merged into an article that is not large by any means. –Chase (talk) 03:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]