Talk:Jatinga

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Assam (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Searching for Sources

After searching Google and the Indian newspapers (in English) listed here Newspapers in India - English, I found the following sources.

A book on the subject, but no online text or bibliography. Paracger Dushyant, D. Hara Prasad, The Bird Mystery of Jatinga, Konark Publichers PVT. LTD., Delhi, 1994.

And a quote about the cause of this mystery from an Indian paper.

Jatinga in North Cachar Hills district was (in)famous for birds diving into fire to embrace death. The gory spectacle drew a lot of tourists too. The myth has since been broken. New studies have proved that torches lit up by the local people used to attract these birds and they were killed the moment they touched down.

The Statesman [1]

--Maetrics 15:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some more sources/news items below:
Jatinga Phenomenon:Do birds really commit suicide
The Land of the Jatinga Bird Mystery
Jatinga Bird Mystery
-Deepraj | Talk 16:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming Suggestions

I also believe this article should be renamed to the Jatinga Bird Mystery, as Jatinga is a specific location and this article is focused more on the mystery. --Maetrics 15:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery explained

This is hogwash. Birds aren't moths, they have color vision which can discern the color of fire and the color of moon light (which birds sometimes use to navigate), they would not fly into fire (or else this hunting method would be used all over the planet since humanity invented fire). Laughing so hard at this right now, changing title to "speculation" because no research has been done to explain this. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant plagiarism?

Most of this article seems to be identical to http://www.assam-tourism.com/jatinga.htm

I don't know who copied whom, but it should probably be resolved either way. ~九尾の氷狐~ ^{(「Sumimasen!」「Dochira samaka?」)} 11:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not plagiarism if it's cited and paraphrased, so the resolution to this problem would be to cite the website and change the wording in the article. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jatinga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619095805/http://www.assam-tourism.com/jatinga.htm to http://www.assam-tourism.com/jatinga.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]