Jump to content

Talk:Jimmy Cauty/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Photo

Jimmy Cauty

I uploaded a photo, NonFreeImageRemoved.svg (right), taken from the Brilliant album cover, but the template insists on making it enormous, which looks terrible. Anyone know how to include it at its normal size (95 x 115)? Rizzoj 13:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Before you do anything else with it, it might help for the pic to actually be OF Jimmy. He's the one on the left of the album cover. The pic you have here now is of Youth.

Categories

I moved the categories from the category that collects articles on Jimmy, to the article on Jimmy himself. I haven't seen any written guidelines on this, but it seems to make sense. The one that caught my eye was Category:Guitarists. Cauty was the only person whose category was on the list (up in the top, as a subcategory), as opposed to the person's article. I've been wandering through categories, looking for other examples of this "problem" to fix, and I haven't found any more (except for one where a band and its category were both in a category). So I'd say there isn't really a mishmash of styles where this is concerned. Aside from that, it makes sense to me. If I'm looking at the list of guitarists, for some reason, I'm probably going to want to look at the biographies for those artists, rather than another list of articles relating to those artists. -Freekee 15:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that's a good point. I think though it should be done with some discretion - in the case of guitarists you're certainly right. In the case of Category:The KLF however, I think it might be better to have his subcategory appear. Also, I know that subcats appear in most uses of... hmm... I think it's the Grammy Award winners. --kingboyk 15:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I wasn't too sure about the KLF thing. What would be most helpful to someone interested in The KLF? If someone wants to learn more about related projects, would they want to first learn who this guy is, and then branch out from there, or would it be good to show them the whole list of everyone who is related to the guy who's related to The KLF? I'd lean towards the former. -Freekee 16:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Not sure to be honest. Let's wait until User:Vinoir (the other active KLF editor) shows up and get a third opinion. --kingboyk 20:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
I asked for a more opinions at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Music#Categories (which you may have seen by now). Seems like kind of a wide-reaching issue. I couldn't find any rules at WP:CGZ. I think we'll just have to go with what makes sense, but I'd like it to apply to bands in general. -Freekee 03:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I've learnt recently that articles with an eponymous category should be in the categories they would belong to if they didn't have that eponymous category, meaning Freekee was correct. The eponymous categories themselves should belong to, at the very least, Category:Categories named after musicians. --kingboyk 10:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Cressida or Alannah?

Cressida is mentioned in the present tense, although it's been documented (and photographed) that he is in a relationship with Alannah Currie. The cited article dates from 1994, while Currie has been open about their relationship in interviews over the last few years. [link] It may not mean Jimmy and Cressida are divorced (does anyone here know?), but shouldn't the current relationship with Currie should be documented if it is also publicly acknowledged? 70.23.65.181 (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

File:OrbLovingYou.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:OrbLovingYou.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jimmy Cauty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jimmy_Cauty/Archive_1&oldid=1190149605"