Talk:John Forbes and Company

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 October 2017 by reviewer Smmurphy (talk · contribs).

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Changes to draft of John Forbes and company article

As of Oct. 10th, I have added citations for nearly every paragraph, and have cited only a few pages in each case, now using the Harvard reference system as suggested by the editors. I have also added a citation to an 1821 book by an unrelated author named James Grant Forbes in which the John Forbes & Co. purchase is mentioned, along with a map to the town the developers attempted to create to sell land. This book is available on line at the link provided in the Reference section. For completeness, I also added a reference for David White's 1973 dissertation about the John Forbes Company. No electronic version is available, but several libraries have bound copies. A short version was published in the Florida Historical Quarterly, which is also cited and linked.

I had already added four new references (Boyd, Brown, Kennedy and White) that were published in the journal, Florida Historical Quarterly and one link to a US Supreme Court decision (Holmes) related to the Forbes grants. Each of these is directly accessible by a quick link or pdf file in the Reference section so reviewers can verify the sources.

I removed the prior reference to the genealogy of John Forbes' wife, Marie Isabelle Narbonne, and substituted the direct link to the source document (reference 5). Although probably self-published, readers can verify the information by searching the document for Forbes or Narbonne. Genealogies are the only source I know for this information.

I also obtained a second review and have edited the piece based on that review. In addition, two local historians who are knowledgeable about this topic have read the article and did not suggest more changes. Therefore, I would like to resubmit for review because I agree that the information could be better improved within the context of regular Wikipedia pages.

Wikipedia editors added three specific suggestions concerning the page ranges for references, the lead summary, and the captions yesterday. I have rewritten the lead summary according to the suggestion, and also changed the figure captions to meet guidelines. I have changed the references as suggested, and think that the article is greatly improved and hopefully ready to become a regular Wikipedia page.

Thank you for your work reviewing this, JLH