Talk:John Patton Log Cabin

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

IvoShandor 21:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Patton Log Cabin

Whereas I don't have a clue where this building might stand I am really sure it isn't located on the place for which coordinates are are given in the article. --Matthiasb (talk) 11:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Moved from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places[reply]

I checked the coords from the Elkman tool, which gives the location as 40°38′55″N 88°46′48″W / 40.64861°N 88.78000°W / 40.64861; -88.78000. Does that seem more accurate?--GrapedApe (talk) 12:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that seems more reasonable than the middle of a a storage or fabrication hall where the former coordinates have been pointed. From looking on the Google satellite image I'd guess that the building is located about 100 yards more to the south but there are some trees which are covering the details. --Matthiasb (talk) 12:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you notice in the photo, there is a swimming pool in the background, as well as coords on the file, which are the same as elkman's. FWIW, I guesstimate that it's the next tree south of the Elkman coord, at 40°38′54″N 88°46′48″W / 40.6482°N 88.7801°W / 40.6482; -88.7801 Smallbones_(smalltalk) 21:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bing's birdseye view shows this much more clearly. Andrew Jameson (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]