Talk:Joliette

Canada: Quebec / Geography / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Stub?

I think this article should be marked as a stub.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 09:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joliette, Quebec → Joliette – This article will rename Joliette, Quebec to the new article title Joliette to match the related Canadian city titles per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. There are so much Canadian cities titles without the province included. There are no other cities in Joliette around the world. And this is one of another largest cities in Quebec. Steam5 (talk) 22:59, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support move; the population of Joliette, North Dakota and its Joliette Township are not given and therefore unlikely to compete for primary usage. Even if no move is done, a disambiguation page or hatnotes should be added here and the Joliette, North Dakota article. Dru of Id (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Needless disambiguation. Rennell435 (talk) 10:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - meets the test in the naming convention. Joliette already redirects to this article, the Joliette, North Dakota is better handled through a hatnote, and the remaining uses (notably, federal and provincial ridings) are secondary uses to the main use that is the subject of this article. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PRECISION and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Jenks24 (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Disambiguation

The disambiguation was removed, why is that?

65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's way too lengthy a hatnote. Some of those items, like the railway station, airport and diocese are only partial matches are should not even be included. It should be replaced by Joliette (disambiguation). --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How are they "partial matches"? The Airport is called "Joliette", the rail station is also called "Joliette"; The diocese is called "Joliette". The title of our articles are not that. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]