Talk:June/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk · contribs) 03:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 17:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this review; it will be used for the WikiCup. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A source spot-check has been done:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Source spotchecks
[edit]Seven randomly chosen citations:
- 28 in combination with 29, cites the sentence "The most well-known month-long observance in the United States in June is Pride Month, which is the celebration of LGBT individuals and the advancement of their civil liberties"; I do not see where "the most well-known month-long observance in the United States" is supported, nor "the celebration ... of their civil liberties".
- 5 I do not see where "entered English in the 13th century via the Anglo-Norman join, junye and junie" is supported by the source
- 61 good
- 21 good
- 60 good
- 44 good
- 13 can't access; AGF
General comments
[edit]- The nominator is the majority author, so all good on that front.
- The source spotcheck above shows a couple of issues; I will thus perform another spotcheck before the close of the review.
- The "Observances" section needs work.
- The first sentence is about Catholicism, but is not in the "Religious observances" section.
- I don't see much coverage of non-Christian or non-western holidays/observances. Are there no Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Shinto, Taoist, or Jain holidays which can occur in June? Are month-long observances all North American/Caribbean/British?
- File:2018 San Francisco Pride.jpg's caption should describe both the immediate context of the image and the background, rather than just the latter.
- I'll put this review on hold while the above issues are sorted out. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review! Unfortunately I have had unexpected delays, but I will hopefully be able to get to this soon if you spare me a few weeks. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm willing to keep this on hold for a further two weeks, until 23 April. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately unforeseen personal matters have rendered me unable to work on this article anytime soon. Please feel free to fail this GAR. My most sincere apologies and best regards, I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm willing to keep this on hold for a further two weeks, until 23 April. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review! Unfortunately I have had unexpected delays, but I will hopefully be able to get to this soon if you spare me a few weeks. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.