Talk:Jurimetrics

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jurimetrics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071002153806/http://www.law.asu.edu/Jurimetrics/ to http://www.law.asu.edu/jurimetrics

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jurimetrics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150207082908/http://www.abjur.org.br/en/ to http://www.abjur.org.br/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jurimetrics "symbol" is to be removed

There is no jurimetrics "symbol". The image is an artistic creation of the editor who submitted it him/herself (in this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jurimetrics&oldid=717389926), and it has no use outside of an unpublished law review article authored by the same editor (https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00476).

1. "There is no jurimetrics symbol". This shouldn't even require an argument: research traditions rarely have any sort of graphical symbology associated with them. There is no symbol for "fluid dynamics", just as there is no "critical ethnography symbol". Disciplines with long histories such as psychology or law have iconography sufficiently associated with them to justify calling a scale or the Greek letter psi their "symbols".

Additionally, a simple google search for "jurimetrics symbol" and you see this symbol in three places: i) this article; ii) this unpublished article (https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00476); and iii) Ms. Kadam's blogpost (http://ravitakadam.blogspot.com/2016/06/jurimetrics.html), which links to this article. Only source is an unpublished article.

2. In page 12 of the above arxiv paper, the authors state "In 26 April 2016 the same authors purposed [sic] a jurimetrics symbol", and cite

The editor for this version (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jurimetrics&oldid=717389926) is "Fzabala". The author of the unpublished article is one "Filipe J. Zabala". They are, of course, the same person (something they admit to: https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Juri-yang.png)

3. Wikipedia isn't the place for "original research" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research). But is an illustration "research"? Well, the meta-pages say so: "Original images created by a Wikipedian are not considered original research, so long as they do not illustrate or introduce unpublished ideas or arguments, the core reason behind the NOR policy."[

Ergo, the "juri-yang" symbol is better off Wikipedia. Until we see widespread adoption of the symbol outside one unpublished paper written by the very wikieditor who uploaded it in the first place.