Talk:K-30 (Kansas highway)

K-30 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-30 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC) I am looking forward to working with you and hope that we can expedite completion of this review. Thanks. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.

Is it reasonably well written?
A (prose):
Prose was concise and to the point.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
The David Rumsey map collection is a very nice historical tool. Should footnote 9 include its name as well as the name of the underlying map?
Sure, but I have no idea how.— P C B 15:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added it. If there is a better way, someone can always improve it. Racepacket (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. — P C B 16:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is Kansas Highways Routelog a reliable source? Is it the source of your statements that K-30 was paved in 1953? (From the map alone, you can only say "by 1953.")
I added the 1952 map so "in 1953" would work. No it is not a reliable source.— P C B 15:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Article is appropriate for the subject.

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article represents significant work by its author, and only minor suggestion about sourcing and a possible RS question were raised. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]