Talk:K-42 (Kansas highway)

K-42 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 27, 2022. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-42 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain how you get the length from those various pages of the PDF you link to in ref 2?
Not sure that is necessary. An example is New York State Route 22 and New York State Route 28, which are both FA articles. -420Traveler (talk) 12:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
" K-42's western" Its terminus.

Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Along the way it intersects" -> "Along the way K-42 intersects"

Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"to just west" just?
The word "just" is used because the road turns 'just' before it reaches Clearwater. ― TUNA × 17:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tunakanski, but changed wording. -420Traveler (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weird to see traffic stats before describing the history and path of the route.
That's how all of these articles are formatted. ― TUNA × 19:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"::I agree with Tunakanski, they are mostly formatted like this. -420Traveler (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"connects to, to National Highway System at" eh?
Fixed ― TUNA × 17:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Sand Creek. Past the creek it proceeds" -> "Sand Creek after which it proceeds"
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Kansas and Oklahoma Railway" our article calls it "Railroad" not "Railway".
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Red Creek. K-42 soon has" merge and avoid "soon".
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really think these "creeks" will ever be notable?
do you mean I should I remove links? -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well unless you truly believe the creeks will ever rise to meet WP:N, yes. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Department is holding" was.
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"state can't afford" could not.
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"the State Highway Commission asked for" put (SHC) here.
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"was almost completed" just "complete" is fine.
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"R.C. Keeling" -> "R. C. Keeling".
"equivalent to $105,186 in 2020 dollars" don't need the subsequent "dollars" ($ shows that) and probably to the nearest $1000 is fine.
Fixed, the $105,186 figure is from a template that I guess is an inflation calculator so you can't change it. ― TUNA × 19:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are clear instructions at {{Format price}} which describe how to reduce the "accuracy". The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You link US-54 and US-400 in the prose but not the lead?
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"former US 81 Byp" spell it out.
Fixed -420Traveler (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

420Traveler ping. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

420Traveler final ping. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: hey sorry I've been busy working recently. I will get to it this week. -420Traveler (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man I'll start working on this later when I have time since it seems 420Traveler has gone AWOL. ― TUNA × 14:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I fixed most things and have a few questions. Sorry for long delay -420Traveler (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to a couple inline. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Should all be fixed now, let me know. -420Traveler (talk) 12:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool, we're done here, promoting after I tweaked all the overlinking. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 22:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]