Talk:KATSU

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KATSU article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 December 2012 by reviewer Pratyya Ghosh (talk · contribs).

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Graffiti

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information.GraffitiWikipedia:WikiProject GraffitiTemplate:WikiProject GraffitiGraffiti articles

Missing Information

It says that this person is a hacker and yet there is nothing in the article that so much as cover this topic. Also, what is MOCA? This acronym is never associated with a phrase.

PinothyJ (talk) 03:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)…[reply]

Cleanup

This article has almost exclusively written by one SPA, in what might be called a neutral-promotional tone. Done in good faith, but, marked nonetheless as such. The subject of the article is unequivocally notable, but not without some controversy; in this article the controversy seems to be spun as part of the bad-boy brand, in a subtly NPOV way and needs some cleanup. I already removed the hacker and vandal phrasing; these things are true, in a sense, but presenting them in that manner the top is misleading. Probably needs to separate out the critical reception to the bottom. Condense the works substantially. --Theredproject (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]