Talk:Kai Nielsen (philosopher)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Philosophy: Philosophers / Ethics / Social and political / Religion / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy
	Philosophy of religion
	Contemporary philosophy

So, what is Nielsen's approach?

Good reasons approach is suppsedly opposed to Nielsen's approach. So what exactly IS his approach?

I understand this closely has to do with logical positivism.

Can someone point me to papers or summarise this? Got here after watching this on Youtube and looking up Stephen Toulmin. פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 14:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]