Talk:Karlie Kloss/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

No offense to the editors, but the language on this page is quite unsophisticated. Its as if the subject of the article's best friend wrote it. Is the "Personal Facts about Karlie" section professional or even necessary? Do we really need to know of the contents of her suitcase or that she has a crush on Ashton Kutcher? This information is hardly relevant and reads like a fan page. 67.49.1.64 (talk) 20:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

^^Agreed; not encyclopedia-like at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.248.168 (talk) 01:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Before you start, it's (it's not its). Before you want to disagree with a page, learn to type properly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paexo (talk • contribs) 03:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

And also, this page is about a young model who, by normal standards, is not well known and would not be published in an encyclopedia (if not for wikipedia). Taking this too serious sounds ridiculous. I'd rather read useless information, than have to read a tween's poor grammer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paexo (talk • contribs) 03:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Surely if Kloss would not normally merit entry into an encyclopedia there is a question of notability? Certainly WP:BLP says that "In such cases, editors should exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability, while omitting information that is irrelevant to the subject's notability." which supports the "ridiculous"/bare facts approach. Caomhin (talk) 09:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Purposeless photo

The references section certainly doesn't need its own photo (especially when the photo adds nothing the first one doesn't), so I'm going to put it here just in case there's some use for it in the future.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 19:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Karlie Kloss at the Diane von Furstenberg fashion show.

Victoria's Secret Angel rumors

Some users are of the opinion that Karlie Kloss has become a VS angel. Well, she does do a lot for VS but there hasn't been a clear statement that she has been signed as a VS angel. And the link that was given to support her angel-status doesn't mention anything about her being signed at all. It just talks about a new video by Victoria's Secret which includes Karlie Kloss and some of the VS angels BUT (most importantly) two other models called Barbara Palvin and Lais Ribeiro who aren't VS angels either. So the link doesn't suit to be a proof for Kloss' Angel-status. Very important as well: Nowadays (unlike back then till 2008) a lot of websites call models VS angels for merely walking the VS show. In order to provide a reliable source for Kloss' alleged Angel-status, it must be a website that is affiliated with Victoria's Secret. So please consider that before providing a link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VSfan88 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Correction

It's 2013 . She should be 21 years old now.She has a twitter account for huge fans, too. By the way , she's still growing so today her height is more than 185 cm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.119.241.135 (talk) 11:33, 29 April 2013 (UTC)