Talk:Karol G/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
It contains copyright infringements -
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links

Is the Vice article an RS? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vice is okay to use for a GA nomination. If it was an FA nomination; it would not.

AllMusic is marginally reliable, why is it suitable in this case? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen AllMusic be used in FA articles.

Same with the forbes article Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove Forbes since that is an unreliable source

And with Billboard music and E! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard is a high quality sources, and E! works fine too, as long as it is only for GA.

There is a YouTube video, YouTube is not a publisher. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been told by other editors who edit music articles that it is.

It is not a publisher. It is a webhost. You need to specify who the creator (channel) is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Lede

Is there actually a merge discussion ongoing? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I don't know where that is going...

No need to link Colombians. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed

Are the three refs in the lede needed? Can we not cite in the body? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the sources from the lead.

trap artist - will need a link. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinked Latin tap

General

In 2020 Karol G received 4 nominations at the Latin Grammys. - probably worth summarising her Latin Grammys in total, 8 nominations, 1 win etc. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
At age fourteen, she appeared on the Colombian version of The X Factor - probably worth saying what the name of the series was, which I understand is El Factor X. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
chose "Karol G" as her artistic name. - why? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Billboard Hot Latin Songs - should probably link Billboard. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why does Artistry have a subsection of Musical style? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
yet sporty and tomboyish — but never [cutesy]" - source says "cute", any reason to change that? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
diamond wedding ring, confirming the couple's engagement - do you mean an engagement ring? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In July 2020, Karol G tested positive for COVID-19 - not entirely sure why this is worth mentioning. We wouldn't mention if she got the flu but was ok. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Medellín in early life is spelt wrong. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Basilisk4u, any news on this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Lee Vilenski, it looks like the nominator hasn't been active since December 2020. I can take over for them and fix your concerns if thats alright? The Ultimate Boss (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Had chance to look at the remainder The Ultimate Boss? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

user:Lee Vilenski apologies for not completing this sooner. Been busy with trying to bring all of Pop Smoke’s articles to Ga, and finishing up high school. I will complete this tomorrow morning. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No issues The Ultimate Boss, did you get chance to look at the remainder? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been best part of a month, I'm going to fail this one now, feel free to re-nominate at your leisure. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]