Talk:Katherine Cross
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{Persondata |NAME=Katherine Cross |SHORT DESCRIPTION=Known for the strange epitaph on her headstone which reads "Murdered By Human Wolves". Her life and death have been shrouded in mystery. |DATE OF BIRTH=March 13, 1899 |DATE OF DEATH=October 10, 1917 }}
Article Re-written
[edit]The article has been re-written and is awaiting approval from the administrators. T. White 12:05, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments on the draft
[edit]I see that you've put a good bit of effort into rewriting, but I'm afraid that your draft article still reads as very similar to the "Find a Grave" article. The problem really is that this is your only source. Can you find any other sources of information? Could you perhaps track down the newspaper article in which Katherine Cross's death was originally reported? Your article says that "many people" consider that Cross's death was the result of a botched abortion. Who are these people? Can you find some sources to say so? Can you find books, newspaper articles or websites that discuss the "modern legends" about Cross's death? It really seems to me that the way to improve this article is to find more sources. Once you've done that, you can start to think about structure, writing style and so on. (There are quite a few typos in your current draft, so you might want to start by giving it a good proofread.)
Hope this is helpful. Let me know if you have any more questions. MLilburne 21:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Sources Stated
[edit]Ok - - - I have re-written the article and have state sources. Can I please have my article back now? T. White 11:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I found some sources for the fiction section
[edit]I tried to rewrite this a little bit, add some correct citation form, rewrite it a bit, and add some sources to the fiction section. I think it still needs work on expanded the sources for the main part of the article, but I think it is definitely worth keeping around if for no other reason than the truly interesting nature of it. Okiebradshaw (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)