This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Puzzled as to why Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience is the redirect and not the main page. By the page's own words, "Moser research environment" is an informal and imprecise title. The Moser research group, though very important for its founding role, is not the only group at the institute, so the title feels like it places undue weight on them. Additionally, I can't find any common usage of the phrase "Moser research environment." If someone more knowledgeable than me can clarify, I would appreciate it. Otherwise I will ask for help to switch the page/redirect title configuration. Aeffenberger (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's been almost one year since I commented on this, and no page watchers or generally interested editors have made any remarks to the contrary. My stance has shifted; in its current iteration, it seems like the article's true subject is the research environment created and helmed by the Mosers through the years and under different official names (currently the KISN), so I would not push as strongly for moving the pages. The article could do with some editing to clarify what the "research environment" comprises and feature the other groups belonging to the institute. Would love opinions from people with a better working knowledge of how the Moser group / KISN are situated in the modern sysneuro research landscape. Aeffenberger (talk) 02:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
