Talk:Kedartal

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Kedartal is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Altitude

Tim2007viatge (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated this article from "5,000m (16,400 feet)" to "4,750m (15,600feet)", based on a reported GPS measurement and supported by Google and Bhuvan satellite maps.

GPS

Googling for KEDAR TAL ALTITUDE GPS you find a video from year 2010 with this information: "Altitude reading as per gps for camp1 was 13527 feet kedartal showed 15594 feet".

WWW

Many internet sources say 5,000m or 16,400ft, some say 4,425m or 14,500ft. I guess these data are from older, less reliable surveys and have been copied on and on.

PAPER MAP

EXACTNESS

Information about altitude data of places in Garhwal - like Kedar Tal, Badrinath or Hemkund Sahib - varies considerably between different sources. Compared with the exactness of the first measurement of Mt. Everst, 29,002ft = 8,840m measured in 1856, it seems that this region was given less priority by surveyors.

GOOGLE MAP

Kedar Tal can be located with the satellite view of Google Map. By switching to map view with terrain mode, you see that it is between 4,700m and 4,800m altitude lines. This matches with the 4,750m measured with GPS, even if you take into account that peak heights indicated by Google map altitude lines tend to be a bit lower than the real values: Everest (8848m) at 8,800m – 8,900m, Kilimanjaro (5,895m) at 5,820m – 5,840m, Aconcagua (6,962m) at 6,920-6,940, Mont Blanc (4,819m) at 4,780m – 4,800m, Mount Fuji (3,776m) at 3,720m – 3,740m.

BHUVAN

The altitude is 4710m on Bhuvan (3D, measure, query terrain). Bhuvan shows 6,532m for Thalay Sagar (6,840m – 6,860m in Google map) and 8,801 for Mount Everest. Is Bhuvan altitude data more reliable for flat surfaces than for peaks?