From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Kepler-8b has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
March 20, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Kepler-8b is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kepler-8b/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I made a few minor copy-edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Sources check out, RS, no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As much detail as is currently available about an object so far away. Undoubtedly there will be more information in time.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Tagged and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    I have no hesitation in listing this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)