This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
I think the sentence, "Senator Frank Lautenberg submitted McNulty's name for consideration late in the process and it is believed to be a political move to ensure Lautenberg has future support of Schumer," doesn't accurately reflect the source and is POV. The phrase "it is believed to be a political move" gives the impression that this is the consensus view. But the article itself calls that the view of "some" - an amorphous number or proportion. And the only ones calling it a political move in the article are anonymous sources. I'm going to edit that sentence to note that is the view of some anonymous sources. --JamesAM (talk) 17:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
