Jump to content

Talk:Kim Keon-hee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Kim Kun-hee)

move page to Kim Keon-hee

[edit]

https://www.instagram.com/kim_keonhee/

She spells her name 'Kim Keon-hee'. I think this page should reflect the will of herself. So I suggest moving this page to Kim Keon-hee. Justice like river (talk) 10:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism investigations

[edit]

Investigations into her academic writings, some of which were allegedly copied without attribution, should be mentioned because they have been widely covered. Vacosea (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page is much too short

[edit]

As is so frequent with Korea-related articles, this article is crazy short compared to how important she is in South Korea at the moment. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issue still stands months later. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOFIXIT. Black Kite (talk) 07:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My plate's pretty full with even higher priority pages on WikiProject Korea. I wrote March First Movement, around half of Park Chung Hee, and all of Kim Ku. These are some of the most important topics in Korean history, and there's still much left to do.
For articles such as this one, where other people are likely to be familiar with them and interested in them, I try to highlight them as being in need of fixing and stand back, in the hopes that delegation will work. This has worked in a number of cases; it is an intentional choice.
Amidst a flood, telling one of the few people working on things to just work even harder isn't great. On my previous account (User:Toobigtokale), I made 77,000 edits of "so fix it". And on this and another IP most of my work is rewriting or creating pages on topics that I think are culturally important but poorly understood by the average person. I am fixing things, just not this thing. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't a criticism. It's just that obviously the vast majority of en.wikipedia editors won't be as familiar with subjects from other countries, and it therefore falls upon the (fewer) editors who do know about the subject to do so. Therefore, such articles are less likely to be expanded. Black Kite (talk) 08:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was phrased as telling me what to do; that's what bothered me.
I'm aware that the pool is smaller from the perspective of the English-speaking world, but to me this article is part of a larger pool. The average young South Korean cares about this topic; articles that I write are culturally important but young people know/care less about. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]