Talk:King's Medal for Courage in the Cause of Freedom

Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

might want to move to "King's Medal"? Accotink2 talk 20:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't think so - the present name is follows the name of the medal itself. 'King's Medal' would be too obscure and ambiguous. --Xdamr^talk 23:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i see your point, however: "The King's medal was issued in two versions: The King's Medal for Courage in the Cause of Freedom and the King's Medal for Service in the Cause of Freedom." [1] can't find an "official" source to clarify. would be nice to have a list, or history article. Accotink2 talk 01:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That characterisation, the 'Service' and the 'Courage' medals being versions of each other, is not quite correct. Compare the 'Courage' medal with the 'Service' medal. Other than the standard King's head obverse, the two share little in common in terms of design or ribbon. While they were awarded for the same broad class of action (service to the allied cause), the hazard or nature of the service rendered governed which medal was awarded. In that regard it is not at all dissimilar to eg, the award of the Victoria Cross vs the Military Cross - same type of action, but different levels of hazard/bravery involved.

That said, it would be nice to add a little more content for these rather interesting medals. I'll have to take a look and see if I have anything to pad the articles out with.

Xdamr^talk 13:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i agree, and it does point out the confusion of the sources, if it's widely misreported that way, perhaps an "aka" is warranted, also it points out the possibility of a merged article, with both medals as sections, and a split when there is enough content. i leave it to you since you are the expert. Accotink2 talk 15:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Medal for Courage in the Cause of Freedom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060623051652/http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/imperial.cfm to http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/imperial.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]