Talk:Kipchak language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Confused[edit]

The dates given would appear too late for this to be the ancestor of all the Kipchak languages. Besides, we classify it as a sub-branch of Kipchak, so it can't be the ancestor if the class'n is correct. — kwami (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]