Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Top Model Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Top Model task force (assessed as Low-importance).

[Untitled]=

Wikipedia editors, you might want to fix Korea's Next Top Model. --Lena Cops (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to include Call-out Order in Hangeul

I'm not sure why exactly we reproduce the Call-out Order table in Hangeul beneath one in Romanized script. Hangeul is just an alphabet, so including it makes no more sense than if we included a table in Cyrillic for Top Model po Russki, a table in Greek for Greece's Next Top Model, or a table in Mxedruli for Top Girl (Georgia). This is en.wikipedia.org, so it only makes sense that the information on the pages would be in English and would use English orthography, that is, the Roman alphabet.

Furthermore, the table in Hangeul provides no new information; it's entirely redundant of the Call-out Order table above it. Wikipedia articles are not known to tolerate wholesale redundancy. I move that we eliminate the Hangeul Call-out Order tables on all KNTM cycle pages. The contestants' names as written in Hangeul could be included in the Contestants table, though for the sake of uniformity, then I think that should be so done for any show in the Top Model series where the show's home country would write the contestants' names in a non-Roman alphabet.

Also, I second the above call to fix the tables to match the style used for other Top Model series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.253.41 (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korea's Next Top Model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111004072522/http://economy.hankooki.com/lpage/entv/201001/e2010010617025894250.htm to http://economy.hankooki.com/lpage/entv/201001/e2010010617025894250.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]