Talk:Korean armour

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Korean

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force

thanks[edit]

thanks to whoever that added the third type of armor. I did not know such thing existed. I only knew about the first two types, so thats all i could contribute.Odst 08:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One piece?[edit]

Firstly, there shouldn't be a section titled "introduction". If it's truly intro material, it should go into the intro on top. About the content of the "intro" section, though: what does it mean that Korean armours are "one piece"? From the picture's I've seen of Korean armours, it's multi-piece just like the armours in the surrounding regions. Also the explanation following seems to imply that Korea's historical enemies are primarily China and Mongolia, and that the armour are somehow design to distinguish from them. The first notion isn't historically accurate: like most places Korea was just as occupied with internal warfare as with its neighbours. The second notion is also preposterous: effectiveness is always the primary concern of armour design, nobody design armours just to make them easier to distinguish from the enemy. o (talk) 13:19, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need more pictures[edit]

Where are these great pictures? --Korsentry 06:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Korean armour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]