Talk:Krakoa

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 10 April 2023, see discussion.
Speedy keep, 8 January 2023, see discussion.
keep, 30 September 2021, see discussion.
merge to List of Marvel Comics characters, 30 October 2013 (UTC), see discussion.

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mister Sinister#Mother Righteous|Mother Righteous]] The anchor (Mother Righteous) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

There must be a looooooooot of Marvel fanboys here.

That's the only reason I can think that this sorry excuse for an article has survived no less than four AfD's, yet still remains untouched. Reminds me of Reddit's take on WP: "It's mostly just fanboys reciting lore without providing any kind of insight. They just cannot take the perspective of a reader who isn't into superhero comics." Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 07:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Another Cringy Username: Have you considered to "Fix it yourself instead of just talking about it", now that secondary sources which do provide insight have been pointed out? Daranios (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my preferred course of action would be either redirect or delete, both of which have been tried and failed. Judging by the edit history and the unanimous "keep" votes on all four of the AfD's, it's clear to me that the fanboys on here have clutched this article to their hearts and won't suffer a keystroke to be touched. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 17:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Another Cringy Username: But I am sure the "fanboys" would not mind if the analysis by secondary sources would be added to make this a more encyclopedic article, which is also the course of action suggested by policy, while deletion is specifically discouraged in such a case as this here. Daranios (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there are any secondary sources, which is why I vote for redirect. Something tells me academics aren't tripping over themselves to comment on a comic book. If you can find those sources, why not take your own advice and work on this yourself? I've done what I think is best, only to have it reverted and as I said, I think the fanboy contingent is just too strong here to allow any objective analysis. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Another Cringy Username: Sources are right there listed where I had already linked: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakoa (2nd nomination). (Fanboys or not, it's unlikely the article would have survived four AfDs without indication of notability.) As for myself, it seemed to me you had more problems with the current state than me, taking the time to point it out, and therefore more incentive to improve it. Also I am busy elsewhere working on problems just like this, like here, and just have interests in other areas (and of course limited time). But if you really want to improve here, but don't want to do it alone, would you like us to both work on it? Like splitting the given secondary sources? Daranios (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merged again after 10 years

Seeing that this page was merged 10 years ago and reverted in all of its in-universe glory w/o any discussion, I have BOLDly remerged it as the same issues exist now which led to the merge in the first place. Anyone who wants to restore the page should be prepared to rewrite the article w/ proper sourcing and real world discussion aimed at the non-fan. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 02:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]