Talk:Kuali Foundation

Software or organization?

I'm not sure why the first paragraph of the article describes the subject as being the organization, rather than its software. The software is what is mostly discussed in the body of the article.

Or, for example, here's a recent journal article that is mostly about the software, though a bit about the foundation: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2015/04/technology/kuali-goes-commercial-library-systems-landscape-2015/#_

In short, I think the software is notable, but I'm not sure at all about the foundation. And, quite frankly, the software is more interesting to Wikipedia readers than the organization is. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Possible additional sources

• http://campustechnology.com/articles/2015/03/26/the-changing-cost-of-open-source.aspx

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 18:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

• http://campustechnology.com/articles/2015/06/23/kualico-as-a-driver-of-open-source-development.aspx

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 04:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

• http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2016/04/22/ebsco-kuali-open-source-project/

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)