Talk:LGBT Democrats

Politics: American / Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

LGBT studies

This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

This is a good start. However, I want you to either create a new article or contribute more than just sources to a very brief or limited article. Since you have already done some research on this topic, check to see what type of page you could create that can contribute to the article on gender binary. I bet you will find a specific aspect to contribute.Ingrid.bego (talk) 14:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you have a lot of good sources and I would keep to that, however, your page lacks in content. I would try to expand on the history of the topic and what legislation is being put into place. One possible section is what will happen to this group when Donald Trump is sworn in to office. Lrmounce1 (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

In terms of sources and organization, this article seems strong and well put together. However, the article in and of itself is quite short and is essentially a definition as of right now. Fleshing this out into a comprehensive article would be the logical step moving forward from here, with key sections explaining perhaps its organizational structure, its goals, its successes and setbacks, etc. Beside these points, it shows a really good start. If one is so inclined to be ambitious, one could also include how the organization functions in each of the various states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaeger.kraft (talk • contribs) 23:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think your article is off to a good start and it's very easy to read and I like that you listed all the states and their links. However, it does need more content on the subject and maybe a few more sections. I would personally like to see some different policies the caucus and some of the state chapter have advocated for and helped implement. I especially like how you addressed the first chapter of the caucus. Maybe you could add a section relative to historical background to the first chapter and how it got started. The article may need more scholarly sources but I do like the ones you have provided so far. I definitely look forward to seeing how your article turns out!--MaggieGore (talk) 05:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with both reviewers above. This article is such a great addition to Wikipedia. You just need to expand as much as you can. I am certain someone else will contribute to it in the years to come. You could create a section on History, and also divide the article by states and provide some information on each. Just some ideas. Good job on getting this started. Ingrid.bego (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for your feedback. I took your comments into consideration when finalizing my article! Zdaniels1478 (talk) 04:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link Stonewall Democrats with the Wikipedia page. 24.176.134.15 (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Ingrid.bego (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]