Talk:Praja Rajyam Party

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Praja Rajyam Party article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Andhra Pradesh / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from Labour Party (India) was copied or moved into Praja Rajyam Party. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Translation People's Governance

this may be People's Kingdom! Chavakiran (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better as People's Rule as per Hindustan Times, a reliable source. I'm changing it and sourcing it as well. Mspraveen (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC

Where are the Sting Operations? Money taking for tickets and other issues of the party?

This article looks like its been written by Chiranjeevi himself. Its pretty funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.131.226 (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it was written by Chiranjeevi Himself [1]. I'll remove it as it is a copyvio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.183.216 (talk) 23:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Praja Rajyam Party/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

hi,

I am from India,AP,Guntur but living in the UK,Leeds. I am a fan of chiranjeevi, not for his acting but for his social service and kind heart. I am very happy about his political entry. I follow his news every day to see his progress and I am getting a bit concerned about his party symbol issue. I hope he will find a solution to this problem before its too late.

I was thinking about a solution but was not sure if it will be of any use or if it will be possible to implement the idea. My idea to solve this problem of common symbol for the coming elections is that if the EC does not grant a permisson for the common symbol why cant the PRP use the same symbol but just make minor changes to the symbol for each contesting seat. For example- the actual flag or symbol has 24 line(rays) around the sun, so if we can make changes to the number of lines for each seat say- for a seat contesting in HYD have 24 lines around the sun and for a seat contesting in Vijayawada have 25 lines around the sun and for Nellor have 26 and for some other seat have 27 and 28 and so on. I guess this small change will need to be considered as a different symbol.If the name for each symbol has to be different then we can add the name of the place contesting for every seat say- Guntur Praja Rajyam for the seat contesting in Guntur, Chittor Praja Rajyam for the seat contesting in chittor and so on. I have no idea how far this makes sence but its just a small idea, hope it can be of some kind of help. Well I wish Chiranjeevi all the best and really would like to see him as the next CM of AP.

Thank you,

Nischalbatchu (talk) 03:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 03:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Defunct Party. Not a national Party

The party does not exists anymore. It is defunct. Tessaracter (talk) 06:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Praja Rajyam Party

The party does not even have a single newspaper publication. ECI requires political parties to declare their stakes in media. Please do not vandalize by adding random newspapers Tessaracter (talk)