Talk:Lalita Ramakrishnan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lalita Ramakrishnan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Lalita Ramakrishnan Wikibiography

Hello, if:

You haven't edited before (welcome!) start with The Wikipedia Adventure
You are a Scientist, read the Introduction to Wikipedia for Scientists and Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia from the Wellcome Trust
You are Lalita Ramakrishnan, check the Wikipedia:Autobiography policy before editing
You know Lalita Ramakrishnan check the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest policy before editing
You have questions, that can't be answered by the above, leave a comment below

No Need for Extensive Citations in Lead

@Amir.azhieh: WP:MOSLEAD says that The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article. In this case the main body gives sources that show that the articles were influential, namely articles in The New York Times and statements by the Deputy Director-General of the World Health Organization. Kindly remove the citation template. Thank you. NightHeron (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NightHeron: Thanks for the information you provided me with. I totally agree with that but the information does seem unnecessary to the main body if it cannot be supported with enough evidence. All in all however, I would surely do so, but I was not able to find the New York Times as well as the WHO Deputy Director-General citation, do you mind showing me the citation so that I replace my citation needed with those two links?Amir.azhieh (talk) 04:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Amir.azhieh: Thank you for your prompt reply. Since you agree provided that the citation is given in the lead, I made that change. The New York Times citation was reference #28 before, but now (because it is cited in the lead) it becomes reference #9. The information about the statements by the Deputy Director-General of the WHO was also in the New York Times article. NightHeron (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American?

The lead paragraph and the short description both describe Lalita Ramakrishnan as American. She is an FRS which, as I understand it, means she must (also?) be a citizen of a Commonwealth country. If she were only American, she'd be a Foreign Member (ForMemRS). The Early Life section in the article says she was the first foreign (that is, not American) graduate of the medical residency program at Tufts-New England Medical Center; the reference for that is dead. Could someone please provide a reference for her American nationality and for any other nationality she might have? Thanks --Frans Fowler (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I set the short description, but only based on the existing lead, and beyond noting she had at least worked in America, I did not confirm her nationality. Looking again, https://www.indiawest.com/news/global_indian/cutting-edge-scientists-named-fellows-of-royal-society-for-2018/article_f9df78c2-6b4f-11e8-be73-db047911bcea.html says "Indian American", so in absense of a better source, might be worth adding it to that? I'm not familar with FRS criteria. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've heard, an American (or other foreigner) who has worked in the UK for at least 3 years would be admitted as FRS, not ForMemRS. Unless we have a source that says that she has switched from US to British citizenship or that she self-identifies as British, I think we should assume that "American" or "Indian American" remains correct. NightHeron (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]