Talk:Law of Property Act 1925
|WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom||(Rated Stub-class)|
Many buy to let and commercial mortgages are written under Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA) legislation.
As a debt adviser I have encountered situations where people can lose their homes without a court process as a result of the mortgage on the property they occupy being LPA rather than Administration of Justice Act 1970(AJA)where repossession can only take place after a court hearing.
The position seems anomalous. In the case of a commercial lease, I understand that repossession of the premises that are used by the lessee as a residence as well for business (e.g. a pub) must include a court hearing.
My own view is that legislation is required to ensure that repossession of owner occupied premises must include a court hearing, even where the mortgage is LPA.
Does anyone have any views on this?
- I've copied the question to the Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Law_of_Property_Act_1925. Suggest you watch for answers, there. AndyJones (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)