Talk:Law of supply
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Law of supply article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Symbiosis School of Economics supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
No Law of Supply
- This is exactly what I wanted to discuss as well. I am taking a course in microeconomics right now and the two books we have contradict each other somewhat. Just to give you the relevant excerpts:
- 1) "In general, when there are many sellers of a good, an increase in price results in an increase in quantity supplied, and this relationship is often referred to as the law of supply." Rittenberg & Tregarthen in 'Principles of Microeconomics'
- 2) "Although the Law of Demand requires that the demand curve slope downward, there is no 'Law of Supply' that requires the market supply curve to have a particular slope. The market supply curve can be upward sloping, vertical, horizontal, or downward sloping." Perloff in 'Microeconomics', 5th edition.
- If there still is disagreement about the law, then this should be added to the article. I found the same issue in economics and will get some feedback there first before changing it here.Afghani84 (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
There is a Law of Supply just as much as there is a Law of Demand. Both can be violated. Giffen goods violate the Law of Demand for instance. Without the Law of Supply there would be no Theory of the Firm or profit maximization. I've never heard of that textbook, but you probably took it out of context.
I agree with Afghani. Violations of the Law of Demand can theoretically occur but are rare, and are accounted for.
However, the widespread idea that supply increases when demand increases -- I want some citations. I don't care how many textbooks, professors, or economists say it is true, I want statistics -- raw, hard evidence. So please do not cite a book or person. Please cite a well-documented statistical inference based on real data. SuperChocolate (talk) 00:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
++++ Economics is a descriptive science, not a prescriptive one. There are no laws in economic theory, as there are in, say, physics. Economics has principles based on human behavior. Economics is not about laws that people are supposed to follow. Consider also that if a 'law' can be violated, it's probably not a "law" but something else. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Morgan ++++
Look out for possible copyright violations in this article
This article has been found to be edited by students of the Wikipedia:India Education Program project as part of their (still ongoing) course-work. Unfortunately, many of the edits in this program so far have been identified as plain copy-jobs from books and online resources and therefore had to be reverted. See the India Education Program talk page for details. In order to maintain the WP standards and policies, let's all have a careful eye on this and other related articles to ensure that no material violating copyrights remains in here. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)