Talk:Lead Sails Paper Anchor

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Post-hardcore Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article name[edit]

This article's name is incorrect, should be "Lead Sails Paper Anchor"

Professional Review[edit]

I would hardly call Sputnik Music a professional review site. Anyone is allowed to post their reviews there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.77.199.42 (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm taking the "Topix" review down, as the reviewer hasn't even listened through the album once, and is thus incapable of providing a critical analysis. It seems clear that the reviewer fits an archetype of people who will unnecessarily pan a group because of its fanbase/style/fashion. His lewd comments are disgustiong and would not be found in any respectable publication.

I hope that will suffice to prove I'm not removing because I just don't agree with it. Softwing (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

monkeys[edit]

how come this article doesn't relate to monkeys? wtf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.110.98 (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How come it doesn't relate to selling out? When it's exactly what atreyu did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.235.184.117 (talk) 00:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the truth ^^^^ JEMdev (talk) 03:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok come on people. monkeys? i mean come the hell on  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.211.8.21 (talk) 13:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When Two Are One[edit]

when did they announce that the song will be the next single? MetalMagnet1987 (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They never did. That song is just the song that everyone likes the most. It still doesn't mean that its a single. At least they haven't told me yet...--Kevinlovesyou (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

I've noticed the genre seems to be changed here a bit, I find the reviews are the eaiset way to solve this:

about.com - Metalcore, Pop Punk

allmusic - Punk Metal, Alternative Metal

TuneLab Music - Hardcore, Pop, 80's Rock

From this list I'd say it looks like Metalcore, Alternative Metal are the more clear genres. Then Perhaps Pop Punk amd 80's Rock (or Hard Rock) could also be added. Amazingly I don't see Post-Grunge anywhere, That can go.

Revolver[edit]

'Even lead singer Alex Varkatvas, who in augusttold Revolver that his band "wanted to bust out of the metalcore, emocore, stupid-name-core box" recognised the limited field they were working in.'

I found a link to this on the Atreyu website and was wondering if it could/should be used on the article? I thought I should get a 2nd opinion befor doing any editing. Duck610 (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

12 Song Version?[edit]

I picked up this album from the library and am now looking through it. There are only 12 songs on it, the original eleven and "Epic". Is this some different version of the album? 134.126.191.109 (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just adding to this. The song listing for this album is completely different than the actual album listing, but a couple weeks ago it was correct? What the... :/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.253.11.59 (talk) 03:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lead Sails Paper Anchor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090508183046/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=75196 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/BLABBERMOUTH.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=75196

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]