Talk:Legal informatics

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I'm not sure that point 2, "law and policy", is properly part of legal informatics. The gist of the definition in Erdelez and O'Hare is that legal informatics deals with the application to (typo corrected) of informatics to the law, not the application of the law to informatics. I see the two as distinct areas. There are some people who are interested in both, but the two areas really don't have much in common.

Looking at the pages that drop from a Google search on "legal informatics" I find a few pages that imply that information policy is part of legal informatics, but a greater number that do not. Here's a link to a page that I think makes the distinction nicely: http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~lucchi/legalinformatics.htm. Dpdabney (talk) 11:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--

The point above seems to no longer be valid given the current content in the law and policy section of the article. The section now discusses the application of informatics in various parts of the legal system that have relevance to policy. Suggest that this objection and discussion be closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trustinus (talk • contribs) 10:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose merging. "Legal aspects of computing" is different from "computing aspects of law", which is what this article it. Close, yet far. Int21h (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

how about merging the 2 and titling it with the 2 names with a / in between — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallydoggy (talk • contribs) 20:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delivery of legal services

The subsections of "Delivery of legal services", Online legal services and Regulatory barriers to delivery of legal services are about marketing legal services online, not informatics. My inclination is to remove them from this article and, to the extent that it is appropriate, find a more appropriate home for that content in another article. Arllaw (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are other issues addressed in this article, such as access to justice, that are not related to informatics. If there are no objections, if I find the time I'm inclined to make some significant revisions to this article. Arllaw (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legal informatics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129134550/http://www.legaltechnologyjournal.co.uk//content//view//21//51// to http://www.legaltechnologyjournal.co.uk/content/view/21/51/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

With no objection raised, the merge proceeded. Arllaw (talk) 01:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging Applications of artificial intelligence to legal informatics into this article. It seems like an appropriate subsection for this article, not something that justifies a stand-alone article. Arllaw (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.