Talk:Legal observer

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Legal observer is being Wikified!
Current tasks:

Is this a copyright violation, or does it meet deletion criteria?

✔ pass

Is this a duplicate article?

✔ pass

Add markup, links, layout etc.

✔ pass

Rewrite where needed.

✔ pass

Remove wikify tag.

✔ pass

Help clear the wikification backlog! We need your help!

How to use this template | Template by The Thadman

WP:LE tag removal

I removed the WP:LE tag because it seems that this article is about an organization charged with observing law enforcement actions, and not about law enforcement itself. If anyone disagrees, please replace the tag, but i believe there is probably a better Wikiproject out there for this article.EMT1871 03:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing this article to remove

The tone of this article is confusing. In the first paragraph, it suggest that legal observers is a general term that describes anyone who is engaged in the activity of recording violations of civil rights during demonstrations. However, later in the article it suggests that Legal Observers have mandates, specific goals and commitments to various human rights conventions. One paragraph suggests its a general concept and the other sounds like it's a recognized group with clear membership criteria.

In light of this, I want to remove the third, fourth, and fifth paragraph from this article. In light of the fact that this article has had a heading for the past two years stating that references are needed, I think this editing is warrented. However, I am willing to discuss this changes before handDivaNtrainin (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to comment regarding the removal of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th paragraph. The authors of these paragraphs were simply presented their opinion on what legal observers should be. They were not backed up with references and there is nothing to suggest that individuals who don't follow these ideals would not be considered legal observers.DivaNtrainin (talk) 23:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

legal awareness

You are well come to contribute and improve article legal awareness.

Mahitgar (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legal observer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091004022928/http://www.activistrights.org.au/cb_pages/organising_legal_support.php to http://www.activistrights.org.au/cb_pages/organising_legal_support.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]