This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
I am currently in the special collections reading room at the library, working closely with the curators. Can I ask on their behalf that medieval manuscripts be cited by the three-letter form that is preferred by the library rather than the sundry longer forms found in older literature. If in doubt, check their website http://www.library.leiden.edu/special-collections/manuscripts/. So for example:
BPL 3 - not, for example, MS lat 3 or Bib pub L3
VLQ 3 - not, for example, Vossianus Q 3 or Voss lat 3q
VUL 3 - not, for example, Ms. Vulc. Lat. 3
SCA 3 - not, for example, Scaliger Lat 3
LTK 3 - not, for example, Ltk. 3 or MS letterkunde 3
It is difficult, I know, because there is so much inconsistency in the literature, but getting it right is a courtesy to the library, and helps us all in the long run. --Doric Loon (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
