Talk:Lex Mundi

Change History[edit]

Adding third party reference material from https://www.martindale.com/xp/legal/Professional_Resources/Law_Firm_Associations/L-16.xml Bludder204 (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added more reference material to Arab Times newspaper clipping -http://www.davisbrownlaw.com/documents/news/Article__Arab_Times_BC80AD13DFC33.pdf Bludder204 (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Debate Log[edit]

This page is under development and is similar in nature to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritas_%28law%29

Please do not delete this page as its hard to add content to bring it up to spec when its deleted before its finished. Bludder204 (talk) 20:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it appears you are promoting your company, and this article has already been speedy-deleted twice. Your company does not appear to compare with the other one you mentioned. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Realkyhick, in which way does it not compare? The page structure of the two pages are almost identical, except this one uses an info box and Meritas doesn't. This page is not intended to be an advertisement or promotion as I have no affiliation with Lex Mundi. As a multi-national organization serving over 100 countries I feel this organization should be listed, similar to that of Meritas. Bludder204 (talk) 20:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further, I find this page provides more encyclopedic value content then that of the Seven Sisters page which simply lists 7 law firms based out of Toronto. Bludder204 (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]