Talk:Liberty Games
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Wikipedia should not be used as a directory and companies ought to be listed when they have created something notable or news worthy. A list of the products this company sells is not noteworthy nor does it warrant having a page.
I believe the article to be purely promotional. All it says it's that they are a leading retailer with no citations. They just list a load of things they sell as well as 2 products they supposedly are Official UK Distributors of which is factually incorrect. Novotable company has ceased trading http://www.novotable.com/ and the offside football table is not and exclusive product. http://www.trifledesign.co.uk/ It's sold in lots of different places, John Lewis about 10 other websites included so I don't see why this article has anything noteworthy or gives the reader anything apart from promoting the company and it's products? The last think wikipedia needs is spammy pages with no value. The articles was also created by the companies Technical Director. http://linkd.in/kHwimm therefore a conflict of interests.
Itsmee (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
This has been placed by a competitor of Liberty Games, and so the proposition that this page is not neutral is itself not neutral! The page is written in a matter of fact way and in no way promoted Liberty Games, and only states facts that have been backed up by reliable 3rd party sources. As with all wikipedia articles anyone may add to this page. The company responsible for the Novotable is still trading, and although the Offside Coffee Table is sold through other outlets distribution is controlled by Liberty Games.
stukerr (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
This article appears to be neutral, and is simply a description of the company, it's history, and the products it sells. It is absurd to describe something as promotional when there is nothing that is positive or negative about the article.
sbpat21 (talk) 11 July 2011 (UTC —Preceding undated comment added 01:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC).
This article has now become an even bigger list of what the company sells. WP:NOTLINK This is just a collection of links that has no value to the reader or any encyclopedic value. Wikipedia is not promotional nor is it a catalog of lists. Companies do not list their product catagories on this site therefore this paragraph should be removed. WP:PROMOTION. The claim of being the largest purveyor of Arcade machines WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:OC#OPINION. How has this statistic been verified? Please state your source. I still say that this page has been created by the business owner therefore is a conflict of interests and fundamentally promotional in intent. Itsmee (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC).
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Liberty Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070519204721/http://www.t3.co.uk:80/news/247/games/other/novotable_gives_space_invaders_the_elbow to http://www.t3.co.uk/news/247/games/other/novotable_gives_space_invaders_the_elbow
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)