Talk:Lilliefors test

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Statistics (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or join the discussion.

Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Inline citations[edit]

I just added a {{No footnotes}} template. I know there isn't much here, but is it all in the original paper by Lilliefors? I can't really tell without inline citations. The bit that most bothers me is "There is an extensive literature on normality testing, but as a practical matter many experienced data analysts sidestep formal testing and assess the feasibility of a normal model by using a graphical tool such as a Q-Q plot." Yaris678 (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Focus on normality testing[edit]

Given that the KS test is often mis-applied, it would be beneficial to note that Lilliefors modified KS test is not exclusive to tests for normality. The bias introduced by parameter estimation is also true of other distributions. One example with simulated critical values is given here: (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)