Talk:Line of beauty

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

S-curves as distinct from Baroque and Rococo applications thereof[edit]

I think the last paragraph of this article is anachronous. Hogarth was writing in a context of Baroque/Rococco art (his professional career spanned the transistion between high Baroque and Rococco), so saying that his conception of the line of beauty stands in opposition to the sinuous compositions of Baroque and Rococco composition (as if that is somehow a separate and degenerate conception) seems like a contradictory and modernist insertion. --♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William de Bolgne?[edit]

Neither the author William de Bolgne nor the book 'Run from the Seven seas' has any article in wikipedia - and google does not give any clue to who this is either. Can anyone confirm that the author and the book exists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animus00 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs examples[edit]

Badly needs some good visual examples to illustrate the principle. -- Dough34 (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]