Talk:Linköping Bloodbath

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 20, 2012, March 20, 2015, and March 20, 2017.

Military history: European / Nordic / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Categories & subcategories

@Yashovardhan Dhanania: Re your edit, um, but "massacres in Sweden" is a subcategory of "massacres", so there's no need to list the article in both; the most specific will do. This is per WP:SUBCAT. Am I misunderstanding something? 71.41.210.146 (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@71.41.210.146: Ok, my apologies. Please go ahead and revert my edits. Though, add a proper edit summary which specifies this clearly. This is a big reason why most edits are considered vandalism by myself and most other editors here. I apologise and own up my mistake. I will remove the relevant warnings from your talk page as well. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Yashovardhan (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yashovardhan Dhanania: What warnings on my talk page? The edit you reverted was by 158.169.150.4. Yes, in general I really wish people would use edit summaries more (I try to set a good example, with the exception of talk pages where it's kind of moot), but that's a separate issue. It seemed clearly a constructive edit. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@71.41.210.146: Yeah, I just realized that! I will revert my edits soon! Oh and why don't you consider creating an account? Regarding the edits, it seemed constructive but the account was a bit debative as well. I didn't really know about this sub category thing, so that's where I lost it! I am really sorry again, Thanks for bringing this to my notice though! I will fix up the mess I created Yashovardhan (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]