Talk:Lipoprotein(a)

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to blood.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

not an independent risk factor

"In this cohort, Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for [ischemic heart disease] but appeared to increase the risk associated with other lipid risk factors." ^[1] B3141592653 (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9502629

ICD-10 diagnostic codes for Lp(a) approved by the CDC

The Lipoprotein(a) Foundation announced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has approved two ICD-10 codes for the diagnosis of elevated Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a). The ICD-10 diagnosis codes help to identify asymptomatic patients with elevated Lipoprotein(a) (E78.41) and a family history of elevated Lipoprotein(a) (Z83.430), and will go into effect in October of this year.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180628005276/en/Lipoprotein-Foundation-Announces-ICD-10-Diagnostic-Codes-Elevated Phantom in ca (talk) 21:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading infobox

The infobox used here (Template:Infobox gene) shows an image depicting apo(a), while its title is "LPA", which according to the article text stands for Lipoprotein(a). In short, it shows a protein rather than a lipoprotein. Since there's no caption for the image, the infobox is misleading.

Of course, the image does not look like a lipoprotein, hence most readers probably will understand that the image does not show an LPA. However, they may fail to guess what it does show exactly.

Paolo.dL (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

incomplete sentence

"One large study suggested that there was a decreased association between lipoprotein(a) levels and risk. [citation needed]" Needs to specify what risk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varidhi Singh (talk • contribs) 13:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

I have made some edits to clarity of language, but I am not sure how much further to edit. Given the scientific subject matter, it seems appropriate that a degree of technical language is used. Apart from the technical terms, the rest of the language seems fairly clear. Usingspoons31 (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

The medical consensus from health authorities is that Lp(a) should be measured once in each adult person’s lifetime. [1], [2], [3]. 90% of a person’s Lp(a) level is inherited. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

Many of the systematic reviews on this article are over 12 or 14 years out of date. I would suggest updating the article with modern reviews [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9502629

[1]