Talk:List of NBC television affiliates (by U.S. state)

This article was nominated for deletion on November 7, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on December 31, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep all.

Untitled

This appears to be a duplicate of List of NBC television affiliates. Should they be merged? Qutezuce 04:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the other article was recently created in error; it was only created a week ago and only goes through Montana. I'll merge the other one in. --AlexWCovington (talk) 04:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeaters

I added in some info on stations that cover much more then their markets. Many of these stations cover their whole states and I think that is something that should be included just as Satellite stations are listed. Oak999 (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I've deleted that infomation. This article, and the other ones similar to this for the other networks, are based on (as the introduction says) City of License. Information on translator stations -- as opposed to full- or semi-satellite stations, such as KNAZ -- should be limited to the individual station articles. Rollosmokes (talk) 08:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who said anything about COL? Also who are you to decide what should be up and what should not? I will take this up for discussion on what others say on here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#TV_Station_Info_for_NBC_by_State

Oak999 (talk) 19:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, it has nothing to do with what I want. I will take the credit for reformatting these state-by-state network listings, and the format has been unchanged and accepted by everyone here. And, it clearly says it is based on City of License. My previous statement stands. Rollosmokes (talk) 08:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added back in DMA by COL in the top paragraph as DMA is important to show what market the stations serve. I think this is something that can be up for discussion if need be.Oak999 (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]