Talk:List of Quebec films

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Canadian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Format/content

The French-language article seems to have both a better format, as well as more updated information. I'll try what I can, but if I could have some help in better organizing this article, it would be appreciated. The French-language article may be found here. SweetNightmares (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to integrate the information from the French article into this one. I've cleaned it up as much as I possibly could. If anyone disagrees with the changes I made, please speak out here first before reverting the article; I spent a lot of time doing this. SweetNightmares (talk) 02:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting?

Who ruined the formatting for this article? And much of the stuff that was copy-pasted from the French article is incorrect on the English Wikipedia (for example, it should have remained "2010 in film" instead of "2010 au cinéma"). Considering that a lot of information was added, I don`t really want to revert, but I worked hard on the formatting of this article while keeping it consistent with the French article. However, I have neglected to update it for some time. SweetNightmares (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The table of contents is way too long... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.251.196 (talk) 02:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I'm talking about. --SweetNightmares (awaken) 19:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at the French one and added a bunch more films. I agree that their layout is much better, as our table of contents is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO long! I propose that we adopt their formatting (ie. putting all the 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, etc. together, and add "2010 in film" once again. Does anyone else agree/disagree? 59.167.194.37 (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been quite a while since these posts were made, so I've gone ahead and made the changes, and the article looks much neater now. If anyone has any objections, please comment here and achieve a consensus before reverting, as it took forever and a day to make it all match.

Thanks! :) ★★Violet Fae (talk)★★ 02:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your work... I know that must've taken a while! Keep it up :) - Sweet Nightmares 01:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]