Talk:List of South American supercentenarians
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
What is appropriately encyclopedic content for longevity related biographies
[edit]There is currently a discussion about what constitutes encyclopedia content on longevity related biographies at Talk:Gertrude Weaver#What is appropriately encyclopedic content for longevity related biographies please comment. I am One of Many (talk) 18:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Requested move 27 August 2015
[edit]It has been proposed that List of South American supercentenarians be renamed and moved to List of oldest South American people. The discussion is taking place at Talk:List_of_African_supercentenarians#Requested_move_27_August_2015. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
"Validation" or not
[edit]I removed the "validation"-based coloring here. If people think that the names lists aren't based on reliable sources, then they shouldn't be there at all. We don't keep "validated" versus "non-validated" sources. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- no thanks moron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.176.58.50 (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Stay civil. If you don't think that non-GRG claims are based on reliable sources, then remove them. Keeping them doesn't help anyone. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Inconsistency beween lists
[edit]These lists should be merged. Why are only some of the people on the living list shown on the comprehensive list? Why are the people on the by country list not all on the main list? Why does the separate Brazil page count 3 or 4 more people in Brazil then this page does? Legacypac (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)