Talk:List of personalities on NFL Network

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Terrell Davis was referred to as a former collegue by Rich Eisen during NFL Network coverage of Shannon Sharpe's Hall of Fame induction. I'm not sure when he left the network, so I'm not editing the page, but it likely needs correction.

Kay Adams link goes to the wrong Kaye Adams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elof69 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hyped up players

Yes, Patrick Mahomes is a good quarterback, yet it is sickening to listen to the Sunday night commentators hype him up like he is the only player on the field. Last night they never mentioned the fact that the Lions held him with no touchdown passes the whole game and also held him to a 3 and OUT as did the Colts last night.

  Yes I am a Lions fan and they gave the Chiefs a heck of a fight in week 4, so why not mention the underdog team and players with their successes instead of hyping up ONE player throughout the game? By the way, good job Colts even though I don’t like like them! Casey DW (talk) 12:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]