Jump to content

Talk:Literary reception of The Lord of the Rings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Work needed

[edit]

The reception areas need to be redone. The reviews written there are pathetically biased and negative to one of the greatest writers of all time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTedder (talkcontribs) 20:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. They are just jealous that they never wrote anything as wonderful as these books are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.145.103 (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Times review by Judith Shulevitz shouldn't be discussed as an original review; it's from 2001. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.102.99.20 (talk) 20:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]