Talk:Litpack

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles

Software: Computing

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

{{prod}} says...[edit]

This article was recently {{prod}}ded, with the justification "Unverified, promotional, part of a walled garden..."

I did a google scholar search on LITPACK. Hundreds of google hits.

So, how would the wikipedia make a fair, policy-based decision as to whether the topic was verifiably notable? Geo Swan (talk) 03:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]