This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
It would be nice to have some information on the themes and subtexts of the film.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.202.168 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 29 September 2006
Only if it's sourced. Such information is frequently written as original research, which is a big no-no. If someone can find reliablly-sourced discussions of the themes and subtexts of this intriguing film, they could improve this article by summarizing it in this article, with citations. ~ Jeff Q(talk)21:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of "no no's," could we perhaps tone down the rather authoritarian imposition in the comments section? The symbolism, the moral of the story, the meaning of the story is this. Slow down a bit, people. The "reading" of the text in the article is fine, but it seems rather old fashioned to offer it so definitively. How about we just start with the much more sensible "the film explores. . ." 65.121.75.99 (talk) 04:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
