Jump to content

Talk:Live at Hammersmith Odeon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mistitled

[edit]

This page is currently titled Black Sabbath: Live at Hammersmith Odeon. However, the band name is not part of the album title either at Rhino Handmade or AMG.

I hope no one objects to my moving this. / edgarde 06:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Nicholls

[edit]

Is Geoff Nicholls credited on this album? If not, someone should add (uncredited) to the his line in Credits. A source would help too if uncredited. / edgarde 18:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

[edit]

Credits isn't a list of "official members". It's who played on the album. Could also include production personnel and concert sound techs. I can see listing the regular band members first, but I don't see the need to wall off the keyboard player. / edgarde 23:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Do

[edit]

Geoff Nicholls was NOT an official member of Black Sabbath. Joe Seigler and his fan site has been a bearer of incorrect info for years, and it needs to be stopped. Geoff was simply a session musician, and to lump him in as a true member is incorrect and ludicrous—Preceding unsigned comment added by OneLove1977 (talkcontribs) 00:17, 7 May 2007

But it's not a list of official members. / edgarde 00:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he was certainly 'official' during the 'Seventh Star' period. Plus, he wrote the bassline to "Heaven And Hell", and lyrics for most of "Seventh Star" and a lot of "The Eternal Idol". It was for the sake of retaining the classic v/g/b/dr that he was not 'official' but, given that he played on albums and toured with the band for some 20 years, to the exclusion of outside work, he hardly falls into the category of a session-musician. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.66.204 (talk) 17:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bsliveathammersmith.jpg

[edit]

Image:Bsliveathammersmith.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]