Talk:Longueville-sur-Scie

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject French communes, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Normandy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

==Heraldry

Untitled

There is no denying that the blason listed violates the rule of color on color. Is that reason enough to refuse an illustration or post an error. The real question is did the French College register this coat. If it is officially registered it seems to me that there is no reason to refuse it. There is president for bad blasons in French Heraldry. For instance the Royal Standard of the Kingdom of France was Metal on Metal (Argent, Fluery Or, etc.). I realize it's the standard and not the coat upon it that violates but there are other examples where it is the coat. Does, this perhaps mean that traditionally the Valois house may have reserved the right to violate for their own coats? RHIP? I'm interested in the answers to these questions as much as in seeing the article improved. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Renoard (talk • contribs) 19:08, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Longueville-sur-Scie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090721114459/http://www.quid.fr/communes.html?mode=detail to http://www.quid.fr/communes.html?mode=detail&id=16586&req=Longueville-sur-Scie

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]